• Screening for Breast Cancer and Heart Disease- Thermography

    From ‘Ask the Physician’ (Issue 22)

    By Philip Hoekstra Ph.D.

     Are there other ways of examining breasts for signs of cancer than mammography ?

     

    Heat emissions from the body can provide an accurate diagnostic window for early signs of breast cancer or heart disease.

     Anontoxic, highly accurate , and inexpensive form of diagnostic imaging does exist and has been used by progressive physicians in the U.S. and Europe since 1962. Called thermography, it’s based on infrared heat emissions from targeted regions of the body.

    As the body’s cells go through their energy conversion processes, called metabolism, they emit heat. Thermography is able to register these heat emissions, display them on a computer monitor, and thereby provide a diagnostic window into the functional physiologic status of a given body area, such as the female breast.

    At present, there are perhaps 1,000 thermography devices in the U.S. for providing this detailed, clinically valuable information. For breast cancer, thermography offers a very early warning system, often able to pinpoint a cancer process five years before it would be detectable by mammography.

    Most breast tumors have been growing slowly for up to 20 years before they are found by typical diagnostic techniques. Thermography can detect cancers when they are at a minute physical stage of development, when it is still relatively easy to halt and reverse the progression of the cancer.

     More Breast-Friendly Than Mammography

    At our clinic, we’ve screened more than 50,000 women since 1971, at a typical cost of $55 for imaging and interpretation. The average mammogram, in contrast, runs about $250 (private practice).

    The procedure is simple and non-invasive. The woman stands bare chested about 10 feet from the device; the imaging takes only a matter of minutes, as results are displayed instantaneously on the monitor; and generally the data can be rapidly interpreted with the assistance of sophisticated image analyzing software.

    No rays of any kind enter the patient’s body; there is no pain or compressing of the breasts as in a mammogram. Thermography is thus a breast-friendly procedure, and its widespread use could save many women from the development of breast cancer and/or highly traumatic surgery and radiation treatments later.

    Mammography has multiple drawbacks and many women are beginning to realize this despite the pressure of conventional radiologists to insist on more screenings at increasingly earlier ages.

    Mammography is uncomfortable, at times even painful for women, as their breasts are held in a vise during the screening. Mammography is only 40% to 60% accurate for premenopausal women or for menopausal women taking synthetic hormones. It is also considerably inaccurate for women with large breasts.

    Mammography is at its best for postmenopausal women, for whom it has an 81 % accuracy rate.

    One study found that self-examination was responsible for a greater percentage of cancer discoveries than mammograms. A 1996 survey of 281 women by Breast Cancer Action in San Francisco, California, revealed that of the 226 women (of whom 70% were between the ages of 40 and 59) who had breast cancer, 44% discovered this through breast self-exam, 37% through mammograms, and 8% through a physician’s exam.

    A serious drawback of mammography is the high incidence of “false negative” results. This means the test indicates there is no cancer in the breast when there actually is; unfortunately, the woman may discover the breast cancer in progress only later when the time for early intervention has already passed.

    Further, according to The Lancet, of the 5% of mammograms that suggest further testing, up to 93% are false positives-i.e., follow-up biopsies indicate no cancer. Furthermore, in 90% of these “callbacks,” the first readings were simply not clear because of dense, overlying breast tissue that interfered with the results.

    The Lancet concluded that for women over 40, “the benefit is marginal, the harm caused is substantial, and the costs incurred are enormous.” The Lancet also stated, “We suggest that public funding for breast cancer screening in any age group is not justifiable.”

    Similarly, fibrocystic breast tissue can be mistaken for tumors and lead to unnecessary biopsies. Perhaps 25% to 30% of women have fibrocystic lumps in their breasts; conventional doctors, worrying about malpractice suits for failing to diagnose cancer, can construe every fibrocystic lump as cancerous and order a rash of biopsies. The biopsy itself is injurious to healthy breast tissue.

    Mammography is contraindicated for women with breast augmentation (silicone or saline implants). The trouble here is twofold: the implant obscures a fair amount of otherwise image able breast tissue and the mammography procedure itself can potentially damage the implants, producing leakage.

    Perhaps most damning, mammography exposes the breast to damaging radiation. Based on 40 years of

    studying the effects of low-dose radiation on humans, John W. Gofman, M.D., Ph.D., an authority on the health effects of ionizing radiation, estimates that 75% of breast cancer could be prevented by avoiding or minimizing exposure to the ionizing radiation from mammography, X rays, and other medical sources.

    With its errors, false negatives, and radiation exposure, mammography is not an acceptable way of screening breasts; the only reason it’s tolerated is that it is a major source of steady income for radiologists. They have come to covet mammography and want no competition from other approaches.

    Meanwhile the incidence of breast cancer continues to rise. Currently, one in eight women will get the disease.

    It was one in twelve in 1971-when we began thermography imaging-and it is occurring in ever

    younger women. Once women start making demands on their physicians for a different imaging approach, thermography can become the preferred initial screening method. Then mammography will be used only as needed to pinpoint the precise location of breast tumors.

    In contrast, thermography is 86% to 96% accurate for indicating cancer in premenopausal women. When there is a mistake with thermography, it is almost never a false negative, but rather a false positive. That means our interpretation of the thermography imaging led us to suspect a cancer process when in fact there was none. Further, while mammography tends to lose effectiveness with dense breast tissue, thermography works independently of varied tissue densities. For this reason, it is especially useful for screening younger women (who typically have denser breast tissue).

    The Heart’s Thermoscape

    Thermography also has clinically valuable applications as an early-warning indicator of heart disease, notably atherosclerosis, before it produces a devastating heart attack or stroke. A thermographic image shows us clearly the areas of diminished energy and blood flow.

    For example, if one finger on a patient is a different color on the thermographic image from all the other fingers, then there is probably a blood flow problem to that finger. This in turn suggests there may be a constriction in the artery serving the finger and thus a problem worth attending to.

    In effect, the patient becomes his own control; you compare the differences in heat emission and circulatory quality on one side of his body against the other. We establish baseline areas in the body where atherosclerosis is almost unknown. You rarely see it in some of the blood vessels at the base of the shoulders which means you can take heat emissions from this area as the healthy norm for that person.

    Over time, we have developed models of healthy heat emission patterns which we call the thermoscape.

    When we see disturbances or deviations in this we know something is abnormal. When there is a restriction of an artery, 90% of the time it is due to atherosclerosis.

    With atherosclerosis, the thickening and hardening of arteries, thermography enables us to see the progressive deterioration of the flow of infrared energy along the course of a narrowed artery. In this way, you can see evidence of restrictions of blood flow in specific arteries serving specific body areas and know that a heart disease process is underway, and you can take corrective action before disaster strikes.

    Objective studies as early as the 1970s showed that, of existing technologies, thermography is the most sensitive (98%) and accurate (96%) noninvasive indicator of heart disease. We are able to establish in a definitive, non ambiguous way clinical evidence about a patient’s cerebrovascular system. There are no drugs, radiation, dye injections, stress, or risk to the patient.

    Let’s look at how thermography helped Henry, 65, avoid a third cardiac bypass surgery and, quite possibly, death from a major heart attack.

     Preventing Another Heart Attack

    When Henry was referred to us by his physician for thermographic imaging, he had already undergone two coronary bypass surgeries to relieve his angina, or heart pain. The first bypass lasted six years, the second wore out after barely two years. Tests showed that Henry’s coronary arteries were blocked again, despite the successive bypasses. This did not surprise us at all.

    Bypass surgery for heart disease accelerates the heart disease process.

    The cause of atherosclerosis is not high cholesterol; it is usually a response to an injury, such as oxidative stress from free radicals. This means toxins in the blood (free radicals), derived both from inappropriate food choices and the normal results of metabolism, cause injury and functional havoc (oxidative stress) in the body’s cells and tissues.

    The process of atherosclerosis has two parts. First there is the actual scarring of the artery (from oxidative stress and free radical damage) as it thickens with fibrous and fatty tissue lesions. Second, a matrix of calcium and oxidized cholesterol, known as plaque, forms over this lesion.

     Quick Definition: A free radical is an unstable molecule with an unpaired electron that steals an electron from another molecule

    and produces harmful effects. Free radicals are formed when molecules within cells react with oxygen (oxidize) as part of

    normal metabolic processes. Free radicals then begin to break down cells, especially if there are not enough free radical uenching

    nutrients, such as vitamins c and E, in the cell. While free radicals are normal products of metabolism, uncontrolled freeradical

    production plays a major role in the development of degenerative disease, including cancer and heart disease. Free

    radicals harmfully alter important molecules, such as proteins, enzymes, fats, even DNA. Other sources of free radicals include

    pesticides, industrial pollutants, smoking, alcohol, viruses, most infections, allergies, stress, even certain foods and excessive

    Slicing into an artery with a scalpel to graft on a new piece causes great irritation and damage to the artery; the bypass surgery itself creates the site for the next accelerated emergence of atherosclerosis. Angioplasty, which involves the inflation of a miniscule balloon within an artery to mechanically widen it, also imparts stress, damage, and local irritation to the linings of the arteries and can similarly start an atherosclerotic process. As an artery’s ability to handle blood flow volume diminishes, more scarring and damage to its membranes result, and the risk of an acute blood clotting episode increases. It is the clotting of platelets (red blood cells) that cause a stroke or heart attack.

    This is why conventional medicine prescribes aspirin or Coumadin: both thin the blood and inhibit clotting. Aspirin, for example, takes a heart disease patient away from the knife edge of attack or stroke but should be used only as a short-term palliative. Henry took aspirin for a while to give the chelation therapy more of an opportunity to work; then he discontinued it except for relief from the occasional headache.

    Bear in mind, the entire body is highly traumatized by open-heart surgery; you are put under deep anesthesia and practically split open like a melon. This procedure – it’s considerably stressful, painful, debilitating, and exceptionally expensive – requires a long recovery and generally cannot be repeated more than twice without enormous risk and because you have likely run out of suitable blood vessels to graft.

    Bypass surgery does absolutely nothing to change the course of the disease. This type of highly invasive surgery provides only a temporary mechanical improvement in blood flow. Unless the patient radically changes his lifestyle and diet and undertakes targeted nutritional supplementation and chelation detoxification, the arteries will quickly clog up again, as did Henry’s.

    His heart pain had returned and he was ready for an alternative approach. Henry had a moderate degree of thickening in the left carotid artery, the major blood supplier to the head. Thermographic imaging showed us that blood circulation into Henry’s head was already diminished; we also discovered he had extensive atherosclerosis in both legs.

    The treatment goal was twofold: first, quit damaging the arteries and allow them to heal naturally; and second, provide the arteries with proper nutrition to rebuild themselves. With this approach, we have been able to help people defy the usual model of heart attack/die, stroke/become a vegetable by doing nothing more than what should be the state of the art for cardiovascular treatment.

    When we examined Henry after the treatment, he reported that his angina had disappeared. Thermographic imaging documented that there was a marked improvement in blood circulation through the left carotid artery. His arterial restriction was reduced from 85% to less than 20%.

    Anything less than 20% restriction is considered minimal and therefore non problematic. Technically, you can find traces of atherosclerosis in nearly anybody. The rate and extent to which it develops (if at all) and the arterial systems it affects is highly variable among individuals. What’s dangerous about atherosclerosis is that it rarely gives a warning. You may not know you are at risk for a mild heart attack or mini-stroke until it happens. Many people don’t get even this warning. They go from feeling fine to suddenly sustaining a major stroke or heart attack.

    Thermography can prevent this atherosclerotic ambush. It helps us identify those people at risk for heart attack or stroke early enough so that effective, noninvasive corrective actions can be taken. Thermography enabled us to monitor Henry’s progress during therapy. First it showed us that Henry was at high risk of having a heart attack or stroke, then later it showed us that his risk was significantly reduced.

    Henry’s case highlights the advantages of thermography as a diagnostic tool for heart disease. It is objective, quantitative, completely safe, and highly reliable. In fact, even if you are not at risk for a stroke or heart attack, thermography can detect the earliest signs of atherosclerosis, long before it becomes a problem; this advance warning can enable you to prevent serious heart disease from ever developing.

     Bypass Surgery and Angioplasty Don’t Extend Life Studies have shown that there is no particular difference in survival between

    those who opted for these procedures and those who did not. Specifically, a report in the New England Journal of Medicine

    (May 1997) showed the ineffectiveness of most angioplasty procedures and bypass surgeries to extend life following a heart

    Scientists at the University of Toronto in Ontario, Canada, studied the death rates for 224,258 U.S. and 9,444 Canadian heart

    patients. They found that at the end of one year following the heart attack, the death rate was 34% in both countries. The crucial

    difference, however, is that whereas 12% of U.S. heart attack patients received angioplasty, only 1.5% of Canadian heart patients

    did; further, while 11.7% of American heart patients had bypass surgery, only 1.5% of Canadians did.

     How Thermography Reads Heat Emissions

    The use of thermography for medical imaging began in 1962, as a civilian offshoot of high technology remote imaging from space-surveillance-by the military. Today, a typical thermographic unit for clinical use costs around $75,000.

    The detection of early breast cancer was thermography’s first medical use. In fact, between 1974 and 1976, the National Institutes of Health (NIH) required the use of thermography in their large-scale, breast cancer detection project. But as complete diagnostic criteria were undeveloped at the time they emerged after 1976 – the NIH dropped thermography from its program and radiologists shifted all their attention to mammography.

    Thermography measures the amount of body heat in targeted areas-such as the breast-as derived from metabolism and as delivered by blood flow. Skin temperature is a reflection of the quality of blood flow in that area. The thermography device converts heat energy emissions into electronic video signals displayed on a computer monitor. Up to 64,000 different points on the body are scanned in a single displayed image, each point representing about one square millimeter (1 mm=.04 inches).

    The thermography device does not send out rays to penetrate body tissue to produce an image. It simply registers infrared or electromagnetic energy naturally and continuously emitted from the body. Unlike mammography, which produces an X ray of the breast’s internal structure, thermography takes a picture (graph) of the infrared energy (thermo) given off during the body’s metabolic processes. While X rays give a structural view (what the body looks like internally), thermography gives us a functional perspective based on physiology (what the tissue is doing in terms of different metabolic rates).

    By studying the infrared emission patterns from the patient’s body, the diagnostician has a direct index of the metabolic activity in the various parts of the body. Disturbances in the energy-conversion processes and reduced blood flow show up in the thermography scan as darker areas.

    Subsequent thermography scans can monitor and demonstrate the progress of treatments as the darker areas become lighter.

     Editor’s Note

    Philip Hoekstra III, Ph.D., is not a physician and does not diagnose, medically advise, or treat patients. Rather, he works with

    holistically-oriented physicians doing diagnostic analysis of patients. Dr. Hoekstra is the director of Therma-Scan, Inc., providing

    diagnostic thermology for the clinical physician, based in Michigan. He received his Ph.D. in clinical physiology from

    Wayne State University in Detroit, Michigan, and has been applying thermography since 1971. His father, Philip Hoekstra Jr.,

    was one of the original developers of the technology. Dr. Hoekstra’s work last appeared in Digest #18, ‘Rheumatoid Arthritis

    and Multiple Sclerosis – The cause May Be in the Blood.

    Leave a reply →

Leave a reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.